Paper Towels vs. Air Dryers

By Heidi Schwartz, on March 15, 2012, on Total Facility Manager

This web exclusive comes from Dave Mesko, senior director of marketing for Cintas Corporation.

With nearly 85% of adults washing their hands after using the restroom, hand washing rates are at an all-time high, according to an observational study conducted by the American Society for Microbiology and the American Cleaning Institute. For years, proper hand hygiene has been a topic of concern in hospitals, schools, restaurants, and office facilities with more awareness campaigns happening. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) supports Global Hand washing Day and dedicates an entire day to raise awareness of global hand washing.

By now, most are familiar with standard hand washing procedure; wet hands with warm water, apply soap, lather, scrub hands for 20 seconds (which is the same timing as humming the “Happy Birthday” song), rinse hands for 10 seconds, dry hands and turn off tap with paper towel.

But several factors alter the effectiveness of hand washing, especially the method used to dry hands. When faced with the decision of offering paper towels or air dryers, facility managers have several factors to consider that can make or break the end result of hand hygiene.

Research completed by the University of Westminster measured differences in bacteria levels after people dried their hands with paper towels and air dryers. The study revealed air dryers increase the average level of bacteria on finger pads by 194% and 254% on palms. This significant increase in bacteria levels creates serious issues in the foodservice industry where bacteria on hands can contaminate food.

Similar issues exist in the medical field, where patients are placed at increased risk of hospital acquired infections (HAIs) with higher levels of bacteria. Conversely, bacteria levels decreased by 76% on finger pads and 77% on palms when paper towels were used.

High power or “jet” air dryers were also shown to increase the average level of bacteria, but it was significantly lower compared to standard air dryers. However, the increased power associated with “jet” air dryers has the ability to spread germs throughout the restroom. Tests revealed measurable bacteria levels more than six feet away from the “jet” air dryer.

In addition to spreading germs, air dryers take a considerable amount of time longer to dry hands compared to paper towels. A standard dryer requires more than 40 seconds of hand drying for hands to be 95% dry. In comparison, paper towels take around 10 seconds to dry 95% of the hand surface.

Many people do not take the time required to dry hands when using an air dryer, which leaves restroom visitors with damp hands. As a commonly known notion, bacteria and germs thrive in damp areas. Without taking the necessary time to dry hands, the susceptibility to spread germs significantly increases.

Paper towels enable users to dry hands quickly and efficiently, resulting in healthy patrons and a cleaner restroom environment. Likewise, a study completed by Georgia-Pacific Professional and a housekeeping publication revealed a preference for paper towels over air dryers.

But not all paper towels are equal. When selecting paper towels, select ones that are strong and textured to help absorb more water and germs, which results in cleaner hands. To reduce the spread of germs further, install hands-free dispensers close to sinks so paper towels are easily accessible for patrons. Finally, implement frequent restroom checks to ensure paper towels remain stocked at all times.

OSHA To Require New Labels For Hazardous Chemicals

by Sam Hananel, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration announced long-awaited regulations Tuesday to improve labels on hazardous chemicals and make them conform with international guidelines developed by the United Nations.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration estimated that such labels could prevent more than 40 deaths and about 500 workplace injuries and illnesses from exposure to hazardous chemicals each year.

Assistant Labor Secretary David Michaels said labels will be easier to understand and less confusing, especially for low-literacy workers. About 43 million U.S. workers come in contact with hazardous materials on the job.

The process of developing the rules began during the Bush administration, and the rules were initially proposed more than two years ago. The Obama administration is holding them out as a product of a presidential directive last year to streamline burdensome agency regulations and eliminate red tape.

OSHA officials said the latest rules would actually save companies more than $475 million annually in training costs and paperwork. Chemical manufacturers currently have to produce two sets of labels and records: one to satisfy U.S. standards and another to meet the U.N. guidelines.

“Not only will it save lives and limbs, but it will lead to increased efficiency on part of employers who produce and purchase chemicals,” Michaels said. “And it will level the playing field for employers to compete abroad.”

The rules will be phased in over a transition period and companies will not have to comply with them fully until June 2016.

Read the complete article at Manufacturing Net

PUBLIC NOTICE Draft – Nevada’s 2008 – 10 Integrated Report

March 16, 2012

Draft Nevada’s 2008 – 10 Integrated Report

The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection is required by the Clean Water Act (CWA) to conduct a comprehensive analysis of water quality data associated with Nevada’s surface waters to determine whether state surface water quality standards are being met and designated uses are being supported.

Nevada’s 2008-10 Water Quality Integrated Report was developed for use by the public, other entities, and for NDEP water quality management planning purposes. Due to delays in the 2008 Integrated report, the 2008 and 2010 reporting cycles were combined for this 2008-10 Integrated Report.

Public comments on the Draft Nevada’s 2008 – 10 Integrated Report will be accepted until April 27, 2012.

The Draft – Nevada’s 2008 – 10 Integrated Report is available at the website

http://ndep.nv.gov/bwqp/303dlist.htm

If you have any questions, please contact the Bureau of Water Quality Planning at the address given below.

John Heggeness
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Quality Planning
901 S. Stewart Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701
(775) 687-9449
Email: jheggene@ndep.nv.gov

Hospitals at risk for hazardous pharmaceutical waste violations

By: Fred Gebhart, Contributing Editor
Drug Topics

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is looking for mismanagement of hazardous pharmaceutical waste generated by hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The odds are good that your hospital is in violation.

“Two-thirds of U.S. hospitals are not fully compliant with EPA requirements,” warned Tim Vanderveen, PharmD, vice president, CareFusion Center for Safety and Clinical Excellence, during a recent webinar, sponsored by CareFusion. “Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians can be held personally liable for violations in which they are involved.”

Hospitals seldom set out to violate EPA provisions. They just don’t realize that they are subject to EPA regulation, said Fred Massoomi, PharmD, pharmacy operations coordinator, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, Neb. He became involved when the hospital was found in violation of EPA’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations in 2004 for the EPA U-listed chemical cyclophosphamide waste handling and manifesting.
Continue reading Hospitals at risk for hazardous pharmaceutical waste violations

Renewable Energy Investments Result in Nevada Jobs and Expansion of Nevada Businesses

Clean Energy report released by Senator Reid outlines Nevada’s winning strategy and highlights SolarReserve’s Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project

SANTA MONICA, Calif., March 12, 2012 /PR Newswire/ —  United States Senator Harry Reidreleased a new report today that puts a bright spotlight on the importance and benefits of federal and state policies to support the development ofrenewable energy sources.

‘We are proud to be a leading example in Senator Reid’s Nevada Clean Energy Report that demonstrates how public-private partnerships create jobs and economic growth for the local community and state,’ said Kevin Smith, CEO of SolarReserve. ‘Clearly, SolarReserve’s Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project that is currently under construction near Tonopah, Nevada, could not have gone forward without supportive public policies and the leadership of Senator Reid and other members of congress and the administration.’

As the report states, the 110 megawatt Crescent Dunes solar thermal energy project near Tonopah will be capable of generating electricity to power more than 43,000 homes (75,000 homes during peak project operations). One hundred percent of the electricity generated by the project will be sold to NV Energy under a 25-year contract, providing Nevada’s largest utility with clean, reliable energy at stable prices that will be unaffected by volatility in oil, natural gas or coal prices. In addition, SolarReserve’s innovative U.S.-developed energy storage technology can store the sun’s energy for an entire day to generate electricity when needed, without interruption after the sun goes down or during cloudy periods – even 24 hours a day.
Continue reading Renewable Energy Investments Result in Nevada Jobs and Expansion of Nevada Businesses

Reno’s first Built Green Nevada home!

CONGRATULATIONS to Di Loreto Homes for completing Reno’s first Built Green Nevada home!  Di Loreto Homes of Nevada has constructed the first home in Nevada to be built under the voluntary green building standards, which includes green certification by the NAHB Research Center.  The home is located in the Di Loreto Homes development New Edition at Damonte Ranch in south Reno. “We are proud to create homes that will actually enhance the environment in which they are being built. The Truckee Meadows is a precious resource and we are delighted to be part of BANN’s Built Green Nevada program,” said Teresa Di Loreto-Long of Di Loreto Homes.  Built Green Nevada is a voluntary program in which local builders are encouraged to demonstrate that the homes they construct are high quality, high performing homes with reduced environmental impacts, lower operating costs, and improved occupant health and comfort.   “This groundbreaking initiative reflects a new residential market available in northern Nevada and signals an increased consumer awareness regarding energy efficiency in the Truckee Meadows,” said Mike Dillon, Jr., Executive Director of BANN.

Visit The Builders for more information http://www.thebuilders.com/

EPA to Host National Webinar on New Stormwater Construction General Permit

EPA to Host National Webinar on New Stormwater Construction General Permit

Publication of new CGP: On February 16, EPA issued its final 2012 Construction General Permit (CGP), which provides permit coverage to operators of construction sites disturbing 1 or more acres of land. The permit is effective in the following areas:

  • Idaho*, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, District of Columbia
  • American Samoa, Guam, Johnston Atoll, Midway and Wake Islands, North Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico
  • Indian Country lands within Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming
  • Areas within Colorado, Delaware, Vermont, Washington* subject to construction by Federal Operators
  • Limited areas of Oklahoma and Texas

For more information, visit the newly updated CGP website at http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/cgp.cfm.

EPA webinar to review new permit requirements: On March 15 from 1:00 to 3:00 pm EST, EPA will host a webinar to provide the public with an overview of the new 2012 Construction General Permit (CGP) and with an opportunity to ask questions of Agency staff. Among the topics that will be discussed are the following:

  • How to Obtain Permit Coverage
  • Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements
  • Pollution Prevention Requirements
  • Water-Quality Requirements
  • Inspection Requirements
  • Corrective Action Requirements
  • How to Terminate Permit Coverage

To register for the March 15 webinar, please go to: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/347121224. There is a limit to the number of participants (1,000), so registration is open on a first-come, first served basis.

 

Lake Tahoe Water Clarity Improved in 2011

Lake Tahoe clarity improved in 2011, but overall has remained nearly stable since 2000, according to UC Davis scientists who study the lake.

Data released today by the UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency reported the average annual clarity level for 2011 at 68.9 feet, a 4.5-foot improvement over 2010, when average clarity levels were the second-worst on record.

Winter clarity last year continued a decade-long pattern of improvement, while summer clarity continued to decline at the same rate that it has since the late 1960s, when monitoring began.

Average annual clarity in the past decade has been better than in recent decades. In 1997-98, annual clarity reached an all-time average low of 65.1 feet. From 2001-11 the average clarity was 70.6 feet.

Yet this year’s value is still more than two dozen feet away from the clarity restoration target of 97.4 feet set by federal and state regulators.

Geoffrey Schladow, director of the UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center, said it is important to remember that long-term trends are a better indication of Lake Tahoe clarity than year-to-year comparisons.

“The factors that contribute to lake clarity are complex, and are not necessarily linked to factors occurring in the current year,” said Schladow. “For example, the 2011 clarity improvement followed a winter that was one of the wettest in recent years, something that is usually associated with clarity declines. Understanding what controls the long-term trends is at the heart of what we are attempting to do.”

Researchers provided measurements for both winter (December-March) and summer (June-September) months. The winter average of 84.9 feet in 2011 was well above the worst point seen in 1997 and a 12-foot improvement over 2010.

Urban stormwater runoff has long been one contributor to reduced clarity at the lake. Most of that runoff occurs during the winter and spring, when rain and snowmelt carry small, inorganic particles from the land into the lake.

Read the complete article at Environmental Protection On-Line