Americans Aren’t Putting Enough Energy into Efficiency Efforts

By Leslie Guevarra

Created 2011-11-02 06:29

Despite a national push for efficiency, Americans aren’t doing enough to stop their homes from being energy hogs, according to research from Shelton Group.

“People have to do more — at least four energy efficiency improvements — to make a real impact on their utility bills,” said Shelton Group President Suzanne Shelton in a statement. “Unfortunately, Americans aren’t reaching that magic number, even though the government and utilities have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get them to act.”

That’s a key finding of the advertising and consultancy firm’s seventh annual Energy Pulse survey, a national poll of attitudes and habits on energy use and efforts to curb it.

Survey results made available to GreenBiz yesterday showed that “self-reported energy conserving behaviors and home improvement activities dropped significantly from last year” and now are more in line with percentages from 2008 and 2009.

Researchers looked at more than a dozen improvements and behavior changes from simply turning off lights and using less energy during peak periods to having a home energy audit. Activity fell in each category this year with respondents doing a mere 2.6 things on average to reduce energy consumption — which was not enough to lower electricity bills.

Oddly, the drop in energy-saving improvements and activity occurred even though Americans seem to be somewhat more aware that their homes need work and that their energy costs are increasing. This year, 23 percent said their homes were inefficient compared to 14 percent in 2010.

The Energy Pulse report offered these explanations for the gap between perception and behavior:

• Denial. “Most Americans continue to live in denial about their energy consumption,” the report said. Despite doing less to save energy, 71 percent of respondents said they believe they are using the same amount or less energy than they did five years ago. Twenty-six percent said they were using more, and 3 percent said they didn’t know.

• A high-tolerance for bill increases. Fifty-eight percent said their utility bill would have to increase by more than $75 a month before they’d consider spending money on energy improvements. On average, respondents said it would take an increase of $112 to spur them to action.

• Costs. “The people who most need to make energy efficient improvements are the least able to make them,” according to Shelton. “Ultimately,” her company’s report said, “those who can better afford to spend money on home improvements were more sensitive to bill increases” and were more likely to make changes that would reduce costs.

• Misplaced priorities. “Consumers continue to prioritize the wrong things,” the report said. Shelton pointed to energy audits as an example in her statement. “Home energy audits continue to be the colonoscopy of energy efficiency,” Shelton said. “Everyone should get one, but too few actually go through with it.”  This year, 15 percent said they had an energy audit done on their home, compared to 20 percent last year. Only a third said they think an audit is necessary and of those people, just 45 percent said they might have one done.

Shelton suggests that government revamp its energy efficiency funding and education programs: “The federal government should take the hundreds of millions of dollars that’s currently fragmented into best-practices tests, block grants and pilot programs all over the country and pool the money into one big pot. Then design a big national education effort to encourage Americans to take the most important four or five steps necessary to see a real reduction in their utility bills.”

Shelton and others at her firm plan to blog on the report and further findings at http://sheltongrp.com/blogs.

Source URL

Study: Smart Fabrics Pose E-Waste Threat

The burgeoning smart fabric industry could pose a serious e-waste hazard, according to a New York Times report.

Researchers have been weaving small electronic components into textiles, allowing the clothes to function as mobile phones, heart-rate monitors and other devices. The ElectroScience Laboratory at Ohio State University is building a cell phone vest.  The designer clothing company Rainbow Winters sells pieces that emit light and change color. Scientists are even creating a fabric than can act as a power supply to run all these gadgets.

But few laboratories are considering the end of the products’ life cycle.

The first large-scale analysis of the issue was published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology in July. Authors Andreas Köhler and Conny Bakker of Technical University Delft in the Netherlands, and Lorenz Hilty of the University of Zürich, reported that e-textile recycling will be difficult because the valuable materials – including copper, gold and silver – will be dispersed in large amounts of heterogeneous material. The combination of electronics and fabrics pose a special problem, with the fabrics jamming e-waste equipment, and the electronics contaminating textile processing.

Read the complete article at Environmental Leader

Mark your 2011 calendar for the next breakfast – November 16th

Third Wednesday of the Month.

Gold Dust West Casino, 2171 US Highway 50 East, Carson City, Nevada.

The breakfast will feature Steve Driscoll, Sparks Assistant City Manager.  Also scheduled is Chris Lynch, Director of the Business Environmental Program – UNR.

Doors will open at 7:30 am.  Meetings are exactly one hour, 8 am to 9 am.  Cost is $20 for members and $30 for future members.  We can now take cash, check or credit card – MasterCard, VISA, Discover, and American Express.

Please RSVP to NBC at 775.882.8306 or kris@nevadabusinessconnections.com.

NBC Progress monthly newsletter, November 2011

EPA Announces Schedule to Develop Natural Gas Wastewater Standards

Announcement is part of administration’s priority to ensure natural gas development continues safely and responsibly
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a schedule to develop standards for wastewater discharges produced by natural gas extraction from underground coalbed and shale formations. No comprehensive set of national standards exists at this time for the disposal of wastewater discharged from natural gas extraction activities, and over the coming months EPA will begin the process of developing a proposed standard with the input of stakeholders – including industry and public health groups. Today’s announcement is in line with the priorities identified in the president’s Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future, and is consistent with the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board recommendations on steps to support the safe development of natural gas resources.

“The president has made clear that natural gas has a central role to play in our energy economy. That is why we are taking steps — in coordination with our federal partners and informed by the input of industry experts, states and public health organizations — to make sure the needs of our energy future are met safely and responsibly,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “We can protect the health of American families and communities at the same time we ensure access to all of the important resources that make up our energy economy. The American people expect and deserve nothing less.”

Recent technology and operational improvements in extracting natural gas resources, particularly shale gas, have increased gas drilling activities across the country. Production from shale formations has grown from a negligible amount just a few years ago to almost 15 percent of total U.S. natural gas production and this share is expected to triple in the coming decades. The sharp rise in domestic production has improved U.S. energy security and created jobs, and as with any resource the administration is committed to ensuring that we continue to leverage these resources safely and responsibly, including understanding any potential impact on water resources.

Shale Gas Standards:

Currently, wastewater associated with shale gas extraction is prohibited from being directly discharged to waterways and other waters of the U.S. While some of the wastewater from shale gas extraction is reused or re-injected, a significant amount still requires disposal. As a result, some shale gas wastewater is transported to treatment plants, many of which are not properly equipped to treat this type of wastewater. EPA will consider standards based on demonstrated, economically achievable technologies, for shale gas wastewater that must be met before going to a treatment facility.

Coalbed Methane Standards:

Wastewater associated with coalbed methane extraction is not currently subject to national standards for being directly discharged into waterways and for pre-treatment standards. Its regulation is left to individual states. For coalbed methane, EPA will be considering uniform national standards based on economically achievable technologies.
Information reviewed by EPA, including state supplied wastewater sampling data, have documented elevated levels of pollutants entering surface waters as a result of inadequate treatment at facilities. To ensure that these wastewaters receive proper treatment and can be properly handled by treatment plants, EPA will gather data, consult with stakeholders, including ongoing consultation with industry, and solicit public comment on a proposed rule for coalbed methane in 2013 and a proposed rule for shale gas in 2014.

The schedule for coalbed methane is shorter because EPA has already gathered extensive data and information in this area, EPA will take the additional time to gather comparable data on shale gas. In particular, EPA will be looking at the potential for cost-effective steps for pretreatment of this wastewater based on practices and technologies that are already available and being deployed or tested by industry to reduce pollutants in these discharges.

This announcement is part of the effluent guidelines program, which sets national standards for industrial wastewater discharges based on best available technologies that are economically achievable. EPA is required to publish a biennial outline of all industrial wastewater discharge rulemakings underway. EPA has issued national technology-based regulations for 57 industries since 1972. These regulations have prevented the discharge of more than 1.2 billion pounds of toxic pollutants each year into US waters.

More information: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/304m/

EPA: Final Effluent Guidelines Plan

The final effluent guidelines plan is out.  This could potentially affect all pretreatment programs if new Categorical Standards are adopted.  Here is the reference for getting the Federal Register notice:

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 26, 2011)].  Pages 66286-66304.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-10-26/html/2011-27742.htm

EPA HELPS COMSUMERS FIND PRODUCTS THAT PREVENT POLLUTION

EPA has launched a new green products portal providing consumers with easy access to information about everyday products that help prevent pollution. Home appliances, electronics and cleaning products, certified to help reduce air pollution, conserve water and energy, and minimize waste can be easily chosen by Americans to protect against toxic chemical exposure.  For more information on EPA’s pollution prevention programs, go to http://epa.gov/p2/

EPA Develops New Planning Approach to Improve Water Quality in U.S. Cities

WASHINGTON Today, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a commitment to using an integrated planning process to help local governments dealing with difficult financial conditions identify opportunities to achieve clean water by controlling and managing releases of wastewater and stormwater runoff more efficiently and cost effectively. The integrated planning process, outlined in a guidance memo to EPA’s regional offices from EPA’s Office of Water and Office of Enforcement and Compliance, will help municipalities prioritize infrastructure investments to address the most serious water quality issues and provide flexibility to use innovative, cost-effective stormwater and wastewater management solutions.

“EPA is firmly committed to helping local governments identify opportunities to achieve clean water using a comprehensive integrated planning approach,” EPA Deputy Administrator Bob Perciasepe said. “An integrated approach allows communities to prioritize their investments to address the most serious water issues first and provides flexibility to use innovative, cost-effective storm- and wastewater management solutions – including green infrastructure.”

Aging sewer systems, not designed to handle heavy rain and snowfall in addition to handling the wastewater from growing populations and local industries, can overflow, releasing untreated sewage into waterways, onto city streets or into the basements of homes. As the runoff flows over the land or impervious surfaces, including paved streets, parking lots, and building rooftops, it accumulates debris, chemicals, sediment and other pollutants. Overflows and stormwater can carry a variety of harmful pollutants, including bacteria, metals and nutrients that threaten communities’ water quality and can contribute to disease outbreaks, beach and shellfish bed closings, flooding, and fishing or swimming advisories.

To better protect water quality, EPA will work with local governments to review the Clean Water Act requirements that each municipality must comply with and look for opportunities to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of solutions developed to meet those obligations. This integrated approach will identify efficiencies where more than one water quality issue can be addressed by the same solution and where competing requirements may exist, including how to best make capital investments and meet operation and maintenance requirements.

Integrated planning approaches can also have other benefits, like leading to the identification of innovative, sustainable solutions that improve water quality and enhance community vitality. Green infrastructure, such as green roofs, rain gardens, planter boxes, and permeable pavement, is an example of an integrated solution that can reduce, capture, and treat stormwater runoff at its source before it can reach the sewer system. Green infrastructure provides a cost effective way to reduce overflows and add green space in communities.

Read the EPA memorandum: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/integratedplans.cfm